1. #1 by BlazingMinds on September 28, 2010 - 5:30 pm

    I’ve seen many a time when I’ve tweeted out a question to all my followers in the past and only around 40% actually answered back, then upon checking with something like untweeps I found a lot hadn’t tweeted for ages, so I unfollowed them ASAP ;)
    Twitter:

    • #2 by Daniel Snyder on September 29, 2010 - 3:29 am

      Are you serious that you get 40% of your followers to reply to you? How is that possible? I also use untweeps and refollow to manage those that I follow.
      Twitter:

      • #3 by BlazingMinds on September 29, 2010 - 7:31 am

        Yep, but as I said that was in the past, as my followers count has increased over time, this percentage has dropped substantially to a tiny number, which is a wicked shame that some people only follow in the hope of being followed back and for no other reason :(
        Twitter:

        • #4 by Daniel Snyder on September 29, 2010 - 12:53 pm

          Yeah this is sad, but I agree it seems often as follow numbers go up the quality of our followers drop. It is a lot harder to engage with 10,000 people then it is with 1,000 or 100… keep trying though!
          Twitter:

  2. #5 by Thiru on September 29, 2010 - 4:29 am

    Great Write up Dani. Most of the follower of mine are not conscious on my tweets and they are not supposed to click it which is really pathetic.

    Does sponsored tweets pay their money in proper? Are they cheaters? Have you ever got money from them?
    Twitter:

    • #6 by Daniel Snyder on September 29, 2010 - 12:52 pm

      Sponsored Tweets is right on top of things, they are really well established and they will pay to your paypal account. You can’t withdraw till your balance is $50 (I’m not there yet), but I know several people that have used sponsored tweets successfully! If you sign up use this link: http://spn.tw/r2FTv
      Twitter:

  3. #7 by A.Tatum on September 29, 2010 - 3:48 am

    I was just thinking about this today. I seen someone follow me, and I looked at their page and all he did was bug people about following him back or he would unfollow you. Give me a break.
    Twitter:

    • #8 by Daniel Snyder on September 29, 2010 - 3:51 am

      I get a lot of that. In many cases those are actually bots. It is a good practice to look at someones tweets, and find out if you’d have any reason to follow them back. I for one will never be someone who promises to follow back. If you can’t share something valuable, I’m out!
      Twitter:

  4. #9 by Moonomo on September 30, 2010 - 12:25 am

    Isn’t this question should be “How many of your twitter followers actually followed by you?” Funny part is those days people just use those tools and connecting back to them is rare- may be none.

    I’ve followed few person here- they never noticed. If that follower/following count and ratio become so important those question shouldn’t asked anyway. Good for blog topic though. ;)

    Happy Blogging.

  5. #11 by Moni on October 2, 2010 - 2:11 am

    Sigh. What do you to when all your followers seem to be spambots?

    • #12 by Daniel Snyder on October 2, 2010 - 2:27 am

      Yeah I hear you! I get mentioned by a lot of spam bots trying to draw me in as though they are personally interested in me. That annoys me the worst!
      Twitter:

  6. #13 by A.Tatum on October 6, 2010 - 1:53 pm

    I don’t even pay attention to tweets that say get 100 or 1000 followers fast. I want real followers not some gimmick.
    Twitter:

    • #14 by Daniel Snyder on October 6, 2010 - 11:29 pm

      Real followers, that’s the key! #followback stuff is pretty shallow, because you are often following or being followed people who don’t even care about you, they’re just after the numbers.
      Twitter:

  7. #15 by Tad Chef on October 7, 2010 - 1:53 pm

    You got a 404 on the traffic spike image.

  8. #17 by Andy @ FirstFound on October 8, 2010 - 10:42 am

    Brilliant post Dan. I’m sure I saw an article saying the useful life of a Tweet (in terms of generating a response) is somewhere in the region of 45 minutes. I’ll try to dig it out for you.

  9. #19 by Aluwir / Norski/ Brian Gill on November 18, 2010 - 5:09 pm

    Good points: I particularly appreciated “Don’t Give Up On Them”.

    The volume of Tweets that can pile up is one reason why I’m a tad selective about who I follow on Twitter – and have a system that’s something like yours, for keeping track of the folks I particularly want to ‘listen’ to.

    It’s a little extra work – but worth it, in my opinion.

    • #20 by Daniel Snyder on November 18, 2010 - 6:19 pm

      Thanks Brian, aka Norski, aka Aluwir. ;-) haha… The more people I follow as I build my twitter account, the less I look at my primary twitter stream. It’s only as I engage and actually ‘meet’ people that I list them and pay attention to them. Just following someone is not ‘meeting’ them… yet.
      Twitter:

  10. #21 by Timothy Eller on November 25, 2010 - 4:50 pm

    Hey,thanks for the great content,I am new to blogging and twitter,this helps out a lot
    Timothy Eller�´s last [type] ..Starting Your Home Based Busin
    Twitter:

  11. #23 by Brankica on December 8, 2010 - 7:57 pm

    Hi Daniels, nice post.
    I was thinking about all this lately. If I am using Tweetdeck to clear out my list so I can follow only the people I like, why do I follow people I don’t want to hear from.
    So I stopped following back automatically and started to pay more attention to what people tweet. I still have lists but at least I know I won’t be overwhelmed with thousands of automated tweets from people that don’t say anything of value.
    Brankica�´s last [type] ..Drink refills for Europeans in USA
    Twitter:

    • #24 by Daniel Snyder on December 8, 2010 - 8:46 pm

      Brankica, I’ve struggled with this one – and have been back and forth on the issue. When I first started with Twitter I was very selective about who I followed. Of course as a result my follow count did not go up. I began to be less selective and slowly my follow count rose, but of course I’m all to aware that the majority of those following me could care less about my tweets. It’s a tough issue – and as I said in the post, it’s not all about the numbers. Quality is far better than quantity. Still, people want to know that you’ll follow them as well – and if you come across as ‘stuck up’ (follow small numbers only), people are likely to skip over you… unfortunately, it’s just the way it is.
      Twitter:

  12. #25 by Amit on March 21, 2012 - 8:32 am

    That is interesting Guide ..Thanks
    Twitter:

(will not be published)

CommentLuv badge